Chapter 05 Review Problems
Generate PDF
Stoichiometry
Balance the following equation.
\[ \begin{align*} \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{NH_3} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Cl_2} ~\longrightarrow~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{NCl_3} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{HCl} \end{align*} \]
Additionally, what mass (in g) of HCl is produced if 1.29 g of NH3 reacts with 4.50 g of Cl2?
Solution
Answer: 2.31 g HCl
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; limiting reactant
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{NH_3} + \mathrm{3~Cl_2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{NCl_3} + \mathrm{3~HCl} \end{align*} \]
To find the actual mass of HCl produced, we must first determine the limiting reactant. We do this by calculating the theoretical yield of HCl from each of the starting reactants. The reactant that produces the lesser amount of product is the limiting reactant.
Yield from NH3:
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{HCl}) &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{NH_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.2\bar{9}~\mathrm{g~NH_3} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}}{\mathrm{17.0\bar{4}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{3~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{36.4\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 8.2\bar{8}05~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 8.28~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Yield from Cl2:
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{HCl}) &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Cl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,Cl_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Cl_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Cl_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,Cl_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= 4.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~Cl_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Cl_2}}{\mathrm{70.9\bar{0}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{3~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{3~mol~Cl_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{36.4\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 2.3\bar{1}41~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 2.31~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Since chlorine (Cl2) produces the lesser amount of product, it is the limiting reactant. The theoretical yield of HCl is 2.31 g.
Balance the following equation.
\[ \begin{align*} \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{C_3H_6} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{NH_3} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{O_2} ~\longrightarrow~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{C_3H_3N} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{H_2O} \end{align*} \]
Additionally, determine the following:
- What is the limiting reactant if 4.20 g of C3H6 reacts with 3.10 g of NH3 and 6.10 g of O2?
- What mass (in g) of C3NH3 can theoretically be produced given the information in (a)?
- What mass (in g) of C3H3N, NH3, and O2 would theoretically be leftover given the information in (a)?
- If 1.90 g of C3H3N was produced in an experiment, what is the percent yield?
Solution
Answer:
The balanced chemical reaction is
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~C_3H_6} + \mathrm{2~NH_3} + \mathrm{3~O_2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~C_3H_3N} + \mathrm{6~H_2O} \end{align*} \]
- C3H6
- 5.29 g C3NH3
- 0 g C3H6; 1.40 g NH3; 1.31 g O2
- 35.9 %
Concept: balancing equations; limiting reactant; percent yield; stoichiometry
a. Limiting Reactant
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of the product, C3H3N, that can be formed from the given mass of each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{C_3H_6}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,C_3H_6}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{C_3H_6}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_3H_6})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,C_3H_6}) ~ \\[1.5ex] &= 4.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~C_3H_6} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~C_3H_6}}{\mathrm{42.0\bar{9}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}}{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_6}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.099\bar{7}86~\mathrm{mol} \\[1.5ex] n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,NH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{NH_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,NH_3}) ~ \\[1.5ex] &= 3.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~NH_3} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}}{\mathrm{17.0\bar{4}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}}{2~\mathrm{mol~NH_3}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.18\bar{1}92~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,O_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{O_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,O_2}) ~ \\[1.5ex] &= 6.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~O_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~O_2}}{\mathrm{32.0\bar{0}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}}{3~\mathrm{mol~O_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.12\bar{7}08~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since C3H6 produces the fewest moles of product, C3H6 is the limiting reactant.
b. Theoretical Yield of C3H3N
The theoretical yield is the mass of product formed from the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= 0.099\bar{7}86~\mathrm{mol} \left ( \dfrac{53.0\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 5.2\bar{9}46~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 5.29~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
5.29 g of C3H3N can be produced.
c. Mass of Leftover Reactants
The amount of each excess reactant consumed is determined by the amount of product formed.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{C_3H_6})_{\mathrm{leftover}} &= m(\mathrm{C_3H_6})_{\mathrm{initial}} - m(\mathrm{C_3H_6})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{C_3H_6})_{\mathrm{initial}} - \left [ n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_6,C_3H_3N}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_3H_6}) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 4.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~C_3H_6} - \left [ 0.099\bar{7}86~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~C_3H_6}}{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{42.0\bar{9}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~C_3H_6}} \right ) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 4.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} - 4.1\bar{9}99~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0\bar{0}00~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 0~\mathrm{g} \\[3ex] m(\mathrm{NH_3})_{\mathrm{leftover}} &= m(\mathrm{NH_3})_{\mathrm{initial}} - m(\mathrm{NH_3})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NH_3})_{\mathrm{initial}} - \left [ n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) ~ r(\mathrm{NH_3,C_3H_3N}) ~ M(\mathrm{NH_3}) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 3.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~NH_3} - \left [ 0.099\bar{7}86~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~NH_3}}{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{17.0\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}} \right ) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 3.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} - 1.7\bar{0}03~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.3\bar{9}97~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.40~\mathrm{g}\\[3ex] m(\mathrm{O_2})_{\mathrm{leftover}} &= m(\mathrm{O_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} - m(\mathrm{O_2})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{O_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} - \left [ n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) ~ r(\mathrm{O_2,C_3H_3N}) ~ M(\mathrm{O_2}) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 6.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~O_2} - \left [ 0.099\bar{7}86~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{3~mol~O_2}}{2~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{32.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~O_2}} \right ) \right ] \\[1.5ex] &= 6.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} - 4.7\bar{8}97~\mathrm{g}\\[1.5ex] &= 1.3\bar{1}03~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.31~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
d. Percent Yield
\[ \begin{align*} \%~\mathrm{yield} &= \left ( \dfrac{m(\mathrm{actual})}{m(\mathrm{theoretical})} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.9\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}}{5.2\bar{9}46~\mathrm{g}}\right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 35.\bar{8}85~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 35.9~\% \end{align*} \]
Balance the following equation.
\[ \begin{align*} \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4} ~\overset{\mathrm{Zn}}{ \underset{\mathrm{KOH}}{\longrightarrow}}~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{C_6H_{12}O_4} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{H_2O} \end{align*} \]
Additionally, determine the following:
- What volume (in mL) of C6H5NO2 (ρ = 1.20 g mL–1) must be allowed to react with an excess of C6H14O4 to produce 6.25 g of (C6H5N)2 if the percent yield is 83.7 %?
- If 0.16 L of C6H5NO2 (ρ = 1.20 g mL–1) and 0.51 L C6H14O4 (ρ = 1.12 g mL–1) react to yield 64.3 g of (C6H5N)2, what is the limiting reactant and what is the percent yield of the reaction?
Solution
Answer:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~C_6H_5NO_2} + \mathrm{4~C_6H_{14}O_4} \longrightarrow \mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2} + \mathrm{4~C_6H_{12}O_4} + \mathrm{4~H_2O} \end{align*} \]
- 8.41 mL C6H5NO2
- C6H5NO2 is limiting; 45 %
Concept: balancing equations; limiting reactant; percent yield; stoichiometry
A
First, determine the theoretical mass of (C6H5N)2 needed to produce an actual yield of 6.25 g.
\[ \begin{align*} \%~\mathrm{yield} &= \left ( \dfrac{m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{actual}}}{m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{theoretical}}} \right ) \times 100~\% \longrightarrow \\[1.5ex] m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{theoretical}} &= \left ( \dfrac{m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{actual}}}{\%~\mathrm{yield}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{6.2\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{83.\bar{7}~\%} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 7.4\bar{6}71~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Now, calculate the volume of C6H5NO2 required to produce this theoretical mass.
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) &= m(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ \rho (\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n[\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ \rho (\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ r[\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2,(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ \rho (\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]^{-1} ~ r[\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2,(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ \rho(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= 7.4\bar{6}71~\mathrm{g~(C_6H_5N)_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}}{182.2\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~C_6H_5NO_2}}{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}} \right ) \\ &\phantom{=}~ \left ( \dfrac{123.1\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~C_6H_5NO_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mL~}}{1.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~C_6H_5NO_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 8.4\bar{0}78~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 8.41~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
B
First, find the limiting reactant by calculating the theoretical mass of (C6H5N)2 produced from each reactant.
From C6H5NO2:
\[ \begin{align*} m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] &= n[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]\\[1.5ex] &= n[\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= m[\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1}~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= V(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ \rho(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_5NO_2})^{-1} ~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_5NO_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= 0.1\bar{6}~\mathrm{L~C_6H_5NO_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~C_6H_5NO_2}}{\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~C_6H_5NO_2}}{123.1\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\ &\phantom{=}~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}}{2~\mathrm{mol~C_6H_5NO_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{182.2\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 1\bar{4}2.0~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
From C6H14O4:
\[ \begin{align*} m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] &= n[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]\\[1.5ex] &= n[\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4}] ~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_{14}O_4}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= m[\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4}] ~ M[\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4}]^{-1} ~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_{14}O_4}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= V(\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4}) ~ \rho(\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_6H_{14}O_4})^{-1} ~ r[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2,C_6H_{14}O_4}] ~ M[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}] \\[1.5ex] &= 0.5\bar{1}~\mathrm{L~C_6H_{14}O_4} ~ \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.1\bar{2}~\mathrm{g~C_6H_{14}O_4}}{\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~C_6H_{14}O_4}}{150.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\ &\phantom{=}~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}}{4~\mathrm{mol~C_6H_{14}O_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{182.2\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~(C_6H_5N)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 1\bar{7}3.26~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Since C6H5NO2 produces the smaller amount of product, it is the limiting reactant.
Next, calculate the percent yield using the actual yield of 64.3 g.
\[ \begin{align*} \%~\mathrm{yield} &= \left ( \dfrac{m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{actual}}}{m[\mathrm{(C_6H_5N)_2}]_{\mathrm{theoretical}}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{64.\bar{3}~\mathrm{g}}{1\bar{4}2.0~\mathrm{g}}\right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 4\bar{5}.28~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 45~\% \end{align*} \]
Balance the following equation.
\[ \begin{align*} \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Fe} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Br_2} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Na_2CO_3} ~\longrightarrow~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{NaBr} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{CO_2} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Fe_3O_4} \end{align*} \]
Additionally, an alloy contains 81.2 % Fe and 18.8 % Ni (by mass). A 6.40 g sample of the alloy reacts with 8.50 g Na2CO3 with excess Br2.
- What mass (in g) of Fe3O4 can be produced?
- What mass (in g) of Fe3O4 is produced if the percent yield of the reaction is 94.2 %?
Solution
Answer:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{3~Fe} + \mathrm{4~Br_2} + 4~\mathrm{Na_2CO_3} \longrightarrow \mathrm{8~NaBr} + \mathrm{4~CO_2} + \mathrm{Fe_3O_4} \end{align*} \]
- 4.64 g Fe3O4
- 4.37 g Fe3O4
Concept: balancing equations; limiting reactant; percent yield; stoichiometry
a. Theoretical Yield
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the theoretical mass of Fe3O4 that can be produced from each reactant.
From the iron in the alloy:
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) &= n(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Fe}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4,Fe}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Fe}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4,Fe}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{sample}) ~ w(\mathrm{Fe}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4,Fe}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.4\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~sample}~ \left ( \dfrac{81.\bar{2}~\%~\mathrm{Fe}}{100~\%~\mathrm{sample}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Fe}}{55.8\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Fe_3O_4}}{\mathrm{3~mol~Fe}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{231.5\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~Fe_3O_4}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 7.1\bar{8}18~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 7.18~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
From Na2CO3:
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) &= n(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Na_2CO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4,Na_2CO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Na_2CO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Na_2CO_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4,Na_2CO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= 8.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~Na_2CO_3}~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CO_3}}{105.9\bar{9}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Fe_3O_4}}{\mathrm{4~mol~Na_2CO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{231.5\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~Fe_3O_4}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 4.6\bar{4}23~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 4.64~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Since Na2CO3 produces the lesser amount of product, it is the limiting reactant. The theoretical yield is 4.65 g.
b. Actual Yield
Calculate the actual yield with an efficiency of 94.2 %.
\[ \begin{align*} \%~\mathrm{yield} &= \left ( \dfrac{m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4})_{\mathrm{actual}}}{m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4})_{\mathrm{theoretical}}} \right ) \times 100~\% \longrightarrow \\[1.5ex] m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4})_{\mathrm{actual}} &= \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{\%~yield}}{100~\%} \right )~ m(\mathrm{Fe_3O_4})_{\mathrm{theoretical}}\\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{94.2~\%}{100~\%} \right ) \times 4.6\bar{4}23~\mathrm{g}~\mathrm{Fe_3O_4} \\[1.5ex] &= 4.3\bar{7}30~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 4.37~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
A mixture contained no fluorine compound except methyl fluoroacetate, FCH2COOCH3 (M(FCH2COOCH3) = 92.08 g mol–1). When chemically treated, all the fluorine was converted to CaF2 (M(CaF2) = 78.08 g mol–1). The mass of CaF2 obtained was 120.1 g. Find the mass (in g) of methyl fluoroacetate in the original mixture.
Solution
Answer: 283.3 g FCH2COOCH3
Concept: stoichiometry
The core of this problem is to relate the mass of the final product, CaF2, back to the mass of the original reactant, FCH2COOCH3. This can be accomplished in a single calculation chain. Note the mole ratios: there are 2 moles of F− per mole of CaF2, and 1 mole of FCH2COOCH3 per mole of F−.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) &= n(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{F^-}) ~ r(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3,F^-})~ M(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{CaF_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{F^-,CaF_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3,F^-})~ M(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{CaF_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{CaF_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{F^-,CaF_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3,F^-})~ M(\mathrm{FCH_2COOCH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= 120.\bar{1}~\mathrm{g~CaF_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CaF_2}}{78.0\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle 2~\mathrm{mol~F^-}}{\mathrm{mol~CaF_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~FCH_2COOCH_3}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~F^-}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{92.0\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~FCH_2COOCH_3}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 283.\bar{2}68~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 283.3~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
A 1.600 g sample of a metal chloride, MCl2, is dissolved in water and treated with excess aqueous silver nitrate. The silver chloride that formed weighed 3.412 g. Calculate the molar mass (in g mol–1) of the metal, M2+, and identify the metal.
Solution
Answer: M = 63.5 g mol–1; Cu
Concept: stoichiometry
The balanced chemical equation for the precipitation reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{MCl_2(aq)} + \mathrm{2~AgNO_3(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~AgCl(s)} + \mathrm{M(NO_3)_2(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The key to this problem is recognizing that while we are provided the mass of MCl2, we do not know the amount of this compound (in mol) present since we do not have its molar mass. We can, however, get this information by realizing the connection between AgCl and MCl2 from the balanced reaction. By substracting away the molar mass of the chloride, we can obtain the molar mass of M2+
\[ \begin{align*} M(\mathrm{M^{2+}}) &= m(\mathrm{M}^{2+}) ~ n(\mathrm{M}^{2+})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{MCl_2}) ~ n(\mathrm{MCl_2})^{-1} \biggl\} ~ - ~ 2~M(\mathrm{Cl^-}) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{MCl_2})~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Cl^-})~ r(\mathrm{MCl_2,Cl^-}) \biggr]^{-1} \biggl\} ~ - ~ 2~M(\mathrm{Cl}^-) \\ &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{MCl_2})~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{AgCl})~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,AgCl})~ r(\mathrm{MCl_2,Cl^-}) \biggr]^{-1} \biggl\} ~ - ~ 2~M(\mathrm{Cl}^-) \\ &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{MCl_2})~ \biggr[ m(\mathrm{AgCl})~ M(\mathrm{AgCl})^{-1}~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,AgCl})~ r(\mathrm{MCl_2,Cl^-}) \biggr]^{-1} \biggl\} ~ - ~ 2~M(\mathrm{Cl}^-) \\ &= \biggl\{ 1.60\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~MCl_2}~ \biggr[ 3.41\bar{2}~\mathrm{g~AgCl} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}}{143.3\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~MCl_2}}{\displaystyle\mathrm{2~mol~Cl^-}} \right ) \biggr]^{-1} \biggl\} ~-~ \Biggr[ 2 ~ \left ( \dfrac{35.4\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}\right ) \Biggr]\\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl[ \dfrac{1.60\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}}{0.0119\bar{0}34~\mathrm{mol~MCl_2}} \Biggl] ~ - ~ \Biggr[ 2 ~ \left ( \dfrac{35.4\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}\right ) \Biggr]\\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{134.\bar{4}1~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~MCl_2}} \right ) - \left ( \dfrac{70.9\bar{0}0~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 63.\bar{5}15~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 63.5~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Consider four individual samples of phosphine (PH3), water, hydrogen sulfide, and hydrogen fluoride, each with a mass of 221 g. Rank the compounds from the least to the greatest number of hydrogen atoms contained in each sample.
Solution
Answer: HF < H2S < PH3 < H2O
Concept: moles; number of particles
PH3
\[ \begin{align*} N(\mathrm{H}) &= n(\mathrm{H}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{PH_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{H,PH_3}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{PH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{PH_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{H,PH_3}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}} \\[1.5ex] &= 22\bar{1}~\mathrm{g~PH_3} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PH_3}}{34.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{3~\mathrm{mol~H}}{\mathrm{mol~PH_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{6.02\bar{2}\times 10^{23}~\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{mol~H}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.1\bar{7}42\times 10^{25}~\mathrm{H} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.17\times 10^{25}~\mathrm{H} \end{align*} \]
H2O
\[ \begin{align*} N(\mathrm{H}) &= n(\mathrm{H}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{H_2O}) ~ r(\mathrm{H,H_2O}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{H_2O}) ~ M(\mathrm{H_2O})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{H,H_2O}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}} \\[1.5ex] &= 22\bar{1}~\mathrm{g~H_2O} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~H_2O}}{18.0\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~H}}{\mathrm{mol~H_2O}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{6.02\bar{2}\times 10^{23}~\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{mol~H}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.4\bar{7}70\times 10^{25}~\mathrm{H} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.48\times 10^{25}~\mathrm{H} \end{align*} \]
H2S
\[ \begin{align*} N(\mathrm{H}) &= n(\mathrm{H}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{H_2S}) ~ r(\mathrm{H,H_2S}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{H_2S}) ~ M(\mathrm{H_2S})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{H,H_2S}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}} \\[1.5ex] &= 22\bar{1}~\mathrm{g~H_2S} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~H_2S}}{34.0\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~H}}{\mathrm{mol~H_2S}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{6.02\bar{2}\times 10^{23}~\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{mol~H}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 7.8\bar{1}02\times 10^{24}~\mathrm{H} \\[1.5ex] &= 7.81\times 10^{24}~\mathrm{H} \end{align*} \]
HF
\[ \begin{align*} N(\mathrm{H}) &= n(\mathrm{H}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HF}) ~ r(\mathrm{H,HF}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}}\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{HF}) ~ M(\mathrm{HF})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{H,HF}) ~ N_{\mathrm{A}} \\[1.5ex] &= 22\bar{1}~\mathrm{g~HF} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~HF}}{20.0\bar{1}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1~\mathrm{mol~H}}{\mathrm{mol~HF}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{6.02\bar{2}\times 10^{23}~\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{mol~H}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.6\bar{5}09\times 10^{24}~\mathrm{H} \\[1.5ex] &= 6.65\times 10^{24}~\mathrm{H} \end{align*} \]
A mixture of BaCl2 and NaCl is analyzed by precipitating all of the barium as BaSO4. After the addition of excess Na2SO4 to a 4.988 g sample of the mixture, the mass of precipitate collected is 2.123 g. What is the mass percentage of barium chloride in the mixture?
Solution
Answer: 37.97 %
Concept: stoichiometry; percent composition by mass
The chemical reaction for the precipitation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{BaCl_2(aq)} + \mathrm{Na_2SO_4(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{BaSO_4(s)} + 2~\mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the mass percentage of BaCl2 in the original sample. We can determine the mass of BaCl2 by relating it stoichiometrically to the mass of the BaSO4 precipitate, as all the barium from the BaCl2 is converted to BaSO4.
\[ \begin{align*} w(\mathrm{BaCl_2})~\% &= w(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{BaSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{BaCl_2,BaSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{BaSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{BaSO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{BaCl_2,BaSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= 2.12\bar{3}~\mathrm{g~BaSO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~BaSO_4}}{233.3\bar{9}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~BaCl_2}}{\mathrm{mol~BaSO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{208.2\bar{3}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~BaCl_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{4.98\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 37.9\bar{7}38~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 37.97~\% \end{align*} \]
A 15.00 g sample of an alloy containing only Pb and Sn was dissolved in nitric acid. Sulfuric acid was added to this solution, which precipitated 3.90 g of PbSO4. Assuming that all of the lead was precipitated, what is the percentage of Sn in the sample? (M(PbSO4) = 303.26 g mol–1)
Solution
Answer: 82.2 %
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; percent composition by mass
The chemical process involves dissolving the alloy and then selectively precipitating the lead as lead(II) sulfate. The key is that all the lead (Pb) from the initial sample is converted to PbSO4.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Pb(s~in~alloy)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Pb^{2+}(aq)} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{H_2SO_4}} \mathrm{PbSO_4(s)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the mass percentage of tin. We can do this by finding the mass of lead, subtracting it from the total sample mass, and then calculating the percentage.
\[ \begin{align*} w(\mathrm{Sn})~\% &= w(\mathrm{Sn}) \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Sn}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{sample}) - m(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) \biggl\}~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{sample}) - \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}})~ M(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) \biggr] \biggl\}~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ m(\mathrm{sample}) - \biggr[ n(\mathrm{PbSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+},PbSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) \biggr] \Biggl\} ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ m(\mathrm{sample}) - \biggr[ m(\mathrm{PbSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{PbSO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+},PbSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) \biggr] \Biggl\} ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ 15.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~sample} - \left [ 3.9\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~PbSO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbSO_4}}{303.2\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~PbSO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{207.\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}} \right ) \right ] \Biggl\} ~ \left ( \dfrac{1}{15.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~sample}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 82.\bar{2}35~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 82.2~\% \end{align*} \]
Hydrogen cyanide is produced industrially from a reaction between gaseous ammonia, oxygen, and methane via the Andrussow process.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~NH_3(g)} + \mathrm{3~O_2(g)} + \mathrm{2~CH_4(g)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~HCN(g)} + \mathrm{6~H_2O(g)} \end{align*} \]
If 6.00 × 103 kg of each reactant react, what mass (in kg) of each product would be produced (assuming a 100 % yield)?
Solution
Answer:
- 3.38 × 103 kg HCN
- 6.76 × 103 kg H2O
Concept: stoichiometry; limiting reactant
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of a product (we will use HCN) that can be formed from the given mass of each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{HCN}) &= n(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,NH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{NH_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,NH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.0\bar{0} \times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg~NH_3} \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{kg}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}}{\mathrm{17.0\bar{4}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~HCN}}{\mathrm{2~mol~NH_3}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 3.5\bar{2}11\times 10^{5}~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{HCN}) &= n(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,O_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{O_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,O_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.0\bar{0} \times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg~O_2} \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{kg}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~O_2}}{\mathrm{32.0\bar{0}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~HCN}}{\mathrm{3~mol~O_2}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 1.2\bar{5}00\times 10^{5}~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{HCN}) &= n(\mathrm{CH_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,CH_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{CH_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{CH_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCN,CH_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.0\bar{0} \times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg~CH_4} \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{kg}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CH_4}}{\mathrm{16.0\bar{5}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~HCN}}{\mathrm{2~mol~CH_4}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 3.7\bar{3}83\times 10^{5}~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since O2 produces the fewest moles of product, O2 is the limiting reactant. All subsequent calculations must be based on the amount of product formed from O2.
Now, calculate the mass of each product formed in kilograms.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{HCN}) &= n(\mathrm{HCN}) ~ M(\mathrm{HCN}) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.2\bar{5}00\times 10^{5}~\mathrm{mol~HCN} \left ( \dfrac{27.0\bar{3}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{kg}}{10^3~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 3.3\bar{7}87\times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg} \\[1.5ex] &= 3.38\times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg}\\[3ex] m(\mathrm{H_2O}) &= n(\mathrm{H_2O}) ~ M(\mathrm{H_2O}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HCN}) ~ r(\mathrm{H_2O,HCN}) ~ M(\mathrm{H_2O}) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.2\bar{5}00\times 10^{5}~\mathrm{mol~HCN} \left ( \dfrac{6~\mathrm{mol~H_2O}}{2~\mathrm{mol~HCN}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{18.0\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{kg}}{10^3~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.7\bar{5}75\times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg} \\[1.5ex] &= 6.76\times 10^{3}~\mathrm{kg} \end{align*} \]
The reaction described in this problem is known as the Andrussow process, developed by German chemist Leonid Andrussow in the late 1920s. It remains one of the primary industrial methods for producing hydrogen cyanide (HCN).
This is a high-stakes, gas-phase reaction that is typically carried out at extremely high temperatures (over 1000 °C) and in the presence of a platinum catalyst. The process is remarkably efficient, but it must be carefully controlled. The reactants—ammonia, oxygen, and methane—can form an explosive mixture. Hydrogen cyanide itself is a volatile and highly toxic liquid, famously used as a chemical weapon in the past, but it is also a critically important precursor for manufacturing a vast range of materials.
Today, the HCN produced via the Andrussow process is primarily used to make adiponitrile (a precursor to Nylon 66), methyl methacrylate (for Plexiglas®), and sodium cyanide (used in gold mining).
Acrylonitrile (C3H3N) is the starting material for many synthetic carpets and fabrics and is produced by the following reaction.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~C_3H_6(g)} + \mathrm{2~NH_3(g)} + \mathrm{3~O_2(g)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~C_3H_3N(g)} + \mathrm{6~H_2O(g)} \end{align*} \]
If 25.00 g C3H6, 10.00 g NH3, and 10.00 g O2 react, what mass (in g) of acrylonitrile can be theoretically produced?
Solution
Answer: 11.1 g C3H3N
Concept: stoichiometry; limiting reactant
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of the product, acrylonitrile (C3H3N), that can be formed from the given mass of each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{C_3H_6}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,C_3H_6}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{C_3H_6}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_3H_6})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,C_3H_6}) \\[1.5ex] &= 25.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~C_3H_6} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~C_3H_6}}{\mathrm{42.0\bar{9}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~C_3H_3N}}{\mathrm{2~mol~C_3H_6}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.59\bar{3}96~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,NH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NH_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{NH_3})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,NH_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= 10.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~NH_3} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NH_3}}{\mathrm{17.0\bar{4}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~C_3H_3N}}{\mathrm{2~mol~NH_3}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.58\bar{6}85~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,O_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{O_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{C_3H_3N,O_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 10.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~O_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~O_2}}{\mathrm{32.0\bar{0}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~C_3H_3N}}{\mathrm{3~mol~O_2}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.20\bar{8}33~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since O2 produces the fewest moles of product, O2 is the limiting reactant. All subsequent calculations must be based on the moles of product formed from O2.
Now, calculate the theoretical mass of acrylonitrile produced.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) &= n(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_3H_3N}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.20\bar{8}33~\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}~ \left ( \dfrac{53.0\bar{7}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~C_3H_3N}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 11.\bar{0}56~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 11.1~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Balance the following equation.
\[ \begin{align*} \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Ag_2O(s)} ~\longrightarrow~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{Ag(s)} ~+~ \rule[-1.0pt]{2em}{0.5pt} \mathrm{O_2(g)} \end{align*} \]
Additionally, consider a 4.260 × 103 mg sample of impure silver oxide that, when completely decomposes, yields 283 mg of O2(g). Assuming that the silver oxide is the only source of oxygen, what is the mass percent of silver oxide in the sample?
Solution
Answer: 96.2 %
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; percent composition by mass
First, balance the chemical equation for the decomposition of silver oxide.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~Ag_2O(s)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{4~Ag(s)} + \mathrm{O_2(g)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the mass percentage of Ag2O in the impure sample. We can determine the pure mass of Ag2O by relating it stoichiometrically to the mass of the O2 product.
\[ \begin{align*} w(\mathrm{Ag_2O})~\% &= w(\mathrm{Ag_2O}) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{Ag_2O}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \biggl\} ~ \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Ag_2O})~ M(\mathrm{Ag_2O})~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \biggl\}~ \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{O_2})~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2O,O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Ag_2O})~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \biggl\}~ \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{O_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2O,O_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Ag_2O})~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \biggl\}~ \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ 28\bar{3}~\mathrm{mg~O_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{g}}{10^3~\mathrm{mg}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~O_2}}{\mathrm{32.0\bar{0}~g~O_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~Ag_2O}}{\mathrm{mol~O_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{231.7\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~Ag_2O}} \right ) \\ &\phantom{=~\biggl\{} \biggr[ 4.26\bar{0}\times 10^{3}~\mathrm{mg~sample} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{g}}{10^3~\mathrm{mg}} \right ) \biggr]^{-1} \biggl\}~ \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{4.0\bar{9}89~\mathrm{g~Ag_2O}} {4.2\bar{6}0~\mathrm{g~sample}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 96.\bar{2}18~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 96.2~\% \end{align*} \]
A 2.000 g sample of a pure, unknown metal (M) containing compound (M2SO4) was dissolved in water and treated with an excess of aqueous calcium chloride. All the sulfate ions precipitated as calcium sulfate which was collected, dried, and found to be 1.916 g. What is the relative atomic weight and the identity of the unknown metal?
Solution
Answer: 23.02; Na
Concept: stoichiometry; precipitation; relative atomic weight
The balanced chemical equation for the precipitation reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{M_2SO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{CaCl_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{CaSO_4(s)} + \mathrm{2~MCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
A Note on the Calculation Strategy: The goal is to find the relative atomic weight of the unknown metal, M. This is a unitless quantity (Ar that is numerically equal to its molar mass (M). The most direct way to solve this is to construct a single equation for Ar(M) based on its fundamental definition: the mass of the metal divided by the moles of the metal. We can determine the mass of M by subtracting the mass of the sulfate from the total sample mass. We can determine the moles of M by relating it stoichiometrically to the moles of the CaSO4 precipitate. The following symbolic derivation builds this complete equation step-by-step.
\[ \begin{align*} A_{\mathrm{r}}(\mathrm{M^+}) &= m(\mathrm{M^+}) ~ n(\mathrm{M^+})^{-1} ~ M_{\mathrm{u}}{^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{M_2SO_4}) - m(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) \biggl\} ~ \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{M_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{M^+,M_2SO_4}) \biggl\}^{-1} ~ M_{\mathrm{u}}{^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{M_2SO_4}) - m(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) \biggl\} ~ \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) ~ r(\mathrm{M_2SO_4,SO_4{^{2-}}}) ~ r(\mathrm{M^+,M_2SO_4}) \biggl\}^{-1} ~ M_{\mathrm{u}}{^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{M_2SO_4}) - m(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) \biggl\} ~ \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{CaSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}},CaSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{M_2SO_4,SO_4{^{2-}}}) ~ r(\mathrm{M^+,M_2SO_4}) \biggl\}^{-1} ~ M_{\mathrm{u}}{^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{M_2SO_4}) ~-~ \biggr[ m(\mathrm{CaSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{CaSO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}},CaSO_4}) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=~~~} \biggl\{ m(\mathrm{CaSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{CaSO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{M_2SO_4,CaSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{M_2SO_4,SO_4{^{2-}}}) ~ r(\mathrm{M^+,M_2SO_4}) \biggl\}^{-1} ~ M_{\mathrm{u}}{^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ 2.00\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~M_2SO_4} ~-~ \Biggr[ 1.91\bar{6}~\mathrm{g~CaSO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CaSO_4}}{136.1\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~CaSO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{96.06~\mathrm{g}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}} \right ) \Biggr] \Biggl\} \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=~~~} \Biggl\{ 1.91\bar{6}~\mathrm{g~CaSO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CaSO_4}}{136.1\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~CaSO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~M_2SO_4}}{\mathrm{\displaystyle mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~M^+}}{\mathrm{mol~M_2SO_4}} \right ) \Biggl\}^{-1} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ 2.00\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~M_2SO_4} - 1.35\bar{1}92~\mathrm{g~SO_4{^{2-}}} \biggl\} ~ \biggl\{ 0.0281\bar{4}74~\mathrm{mol~M^{+}} \biggl\}^{-1} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ 0.648\bar{0}80~\mathrm{g~M^+} \biggl\} ~ \biggl\{ 0.0281\bar{4}74~\mathrm{mol~M^{+}} \biggl\}^{-1} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{g}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.648\bar{0}80~\mathrm{g~M^+}}{0.0281\bar{4}74~\mathrm{mol~M^+}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{g}}\right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 23.0\bar{2}45 \\[1.5ex] &= 23.02 \end{align*} \]
The calculated relative atomic weight of 23.02 closely corresponds to Sodium (Na).
The procedure described in this problem is a classic example of gravimetric analysis, one of the most accurate and precise methods for quantitative chemical analysis. The name comes from “gravity,” as the core of the technique is the precise measurement of mass (weight).
The strategy is always the same: a component of interest in a sample, which may be difficult to weigh directly, is converted into a new compound (a precipitate) with a well-known, stable formula. For this technique to work, the precipitate must be highly insoluble. Calcium sulfate (CaSO4) is an excellent choice here because it precipitates almost completely from the solution, ensuring that nearly every sulfate ion from the original sample is captured and weighed.
By using the mass of the final precipitate, chemists can work backward stoichiometrically to determine the mass or percentage of a specific element or compound in the original, unknown sample with very high accuracy.
6.00 g of barium chloride was added to 225 mL of a 1.40 M solution of sodium sulfide.
- Write the balanced molecular equation and include phase labels.
- Write the full ionic equation and include phase labels.
- Write the net ionic equation and include phase labels. If there is no net ionic equation, write “no net ionic equation.”
- Indicate the precipitate (if any).
- Is there a limiting reactant for this process?
Solution
Answer:
- BaCl2(aq) + Na2S(aq) → BaS(aq) + 2 NaCl(aq)
- Ba2+(aq) + 2 Cl−(aq) + 2 Na+(aq) + S2− → Ba2+(aq) + S2−(aq) + 2 Na+(aq) + 2 Cl−
- no net ionic equation (no reaction)
- no precipitate
- There is no limiting reactant.
Concept: solubility rules; net ionic equations; double-displacement reactions
a. Molecular Equation
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{BaCl_2(aq)} + \mathrm{Na_2S(aq)} &\longrightarrow \mathrm{BaS(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
b. Complete Ionic Equation
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Ba^{2+}(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{Na^+(aq)} + \mathrm{S^{2-}(aq)} &\longrightarrow \mathrm{Ba^{2+}(aq)} + \mathrm{S^{2-}(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{Na^+(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)} \end{align*} \]
c. Net Ionic Equation
After canceling all the spectator ions (which are all the ions in the equation), nothing remains. There is no net ionic equation.
d. Precipitate
Since all potential products are soluble, no precipitate is formed.
e. Limiting Reactant
The concept of a limiting reactant only applies when a chemical reaction occurs that consumes the reactants to form a new substance. Since no precipitation, gas formation, or neutralization occurs in this case, there is no reaction, and therefore no limiting reactant. The final result is simply a solution containing a mixture of four different spectator ions.
Concentration and Dilution
Which solution has the greatest molar concentration of SO42−?
- 0.060 M H2SO4
- 0.27 M MgSO4
- 0.17 M Na2SO4
- 0.098 M Al2(SO4)3
- 0.22 M CuSO4
Solution
Answer: D
Concept: electrolytes; solubility; molarity
To solve this, we must first recognize that all the given compounds are soluble in water and behave as strong electrolytes. This means they will dissociate completely into their constituent ions.
- According to the solubility rules, salts containing the sulfate ion (SO42–) are generally soluble. The cations Mg2+, Al3+, and Cu2+ are not exceptions to this rule.
- Salts containing alkali metal ions (like Na+) are always soluble.
- H2SO4 is one of the seven common strong acids, which by definition dissociate completely in water.
Because they all dissociate fully, we can calculate the molar concentration of the sulfate ion for each solution by multiplying the initial molarity by the number of moles of SO42– produced per mole of the compound.
- a. H2SO4: This strong acid produces one SO42– ion per formula unit. \[ c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) = 1 \times 0.06\bar{0}~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.060~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} \]
- b. MgSO4: This salt produces one SO42– ion per formula unit. \[ c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) = 1 \times 0.2\bar{7}~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.27~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} \]
- c. Na2SO4: This salt produces one SO42– ion per formula unit. \[ c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) = 1 \times 0.1\bar{7}~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.17~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} \]
- d. Al2(SO4)3: This salt produces three SO42– ions per formula unit. \[ c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) = 3 \times 0.09\bar{8}~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.2\bar{9}4~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.29~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} \]
- e. CuSO4: This salt produces one SO42– ion per formula unit. \[ c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) = 1 \times 0.2\bar{2}~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} = 0.22~\class{mjx-molar}{\mathrm{M}} \]
Comparing the final concentrations, the 0.098 M Al2(SO4)3 solution has the greatest molar concentration of SO42– (0.29 M). Therefore, the correct answer is (d).
A solution is prepared by dissolving 4.20 g NaCl, 0.170 g KCl, and 0.180 g CaCl2 in water. The volume of the solution is 500.0 mL. What is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of Cl− in the solution?
Solution
Answer: [Cl−] = 0.155 mol L−1
Concept: electrolytes; molarity
NaCl
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= n(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,NaCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{NaCl})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,NaCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= 4.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{58.4\bar{4}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.071\bar{8}68~\mathrm{mol}\\[3ex] \end{align*} \]
KCl
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= n(\mathrm{KCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,KCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{KCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{KCl})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,KCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.17\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~KCl}}{74.5\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~KCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0022\bar{8}03~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] \end{align*} \]
CaCl2
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= n(\mathrm{CaCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,CaCl_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{CaCl_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{CaCl_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,CaCl_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.18\bar{0}~\mathrm{g} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CaCl_2}}{110.9\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~CaCl_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0032\bar{4}38~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] \end{align*} \]
Cl– molar concentration
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggr[ ( 0.071\bar{8}68 + 0.0022\bar{8}03 + 0.0032\bar{4}38)~\mathrm{mol} \biggr] \biggr[ 500.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \biggr]^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( 0.077\bar{3}92~\mathrm{mol} \right ) \left ( 0.500\bar{0}~\mathrm{L} \right )^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.15\bar{4}78~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.155~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
In the following reaction (Hint: is it balanced?), 55.0 mL of potassium sulfate solution was added to excess lead acetate. What is the molar concentration (in g mol−1) of K+ in the potassium sulfate solution if 1.20 g of PbSO4 was produced?
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{K_2SO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{Pb(C_2H_3O_2)_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{KC_2H_3O_2(aq)} + \mathrm{PbSO_4(s)} \end{align*} \]
Solution
Answer: [K+] = 0.144 mol L−1
Concept: electrolytes; stoichiometry; concentration
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{K_2SO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{Pb(C_2H_3O_2)_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~KC_2H_3O_2(aq)} + \mathrm{PbSO_4(s)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{K^+}) &= n(\mathrm{K^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+, K_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{PbSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K_2SO_4,PbSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+, K_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{PbSO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{PbSO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{K_2SO_4,PbSO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+, K_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.2\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~PbSO_4} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbSO_4}}{303.2\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~K_2SO_4}}{\mathrm{mol~PbSO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~K^+}}{\mathrm{mol~K_2SO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{55.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.14\bar{3}89~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.144~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
If 13.0 g of AgNO3 is available, what volume (in L) of 0.25 M AgNO3 can be prepared?
Solution
Answer: 0.31 L AgNO3(aq)
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity
The goal is to find the total volume of a solution, given the mass of the solute and the final molar concentration. We can find the moles of AgNO3 from its mass and then use the concentration as a conversion factor to find the volume.
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) &= n(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ c(\mathrm{AgNO_3})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{AgNO_3})^{-1} ~ c(\mathrm{AgNO_3})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 13.\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~AgNO_3} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}}{169.8\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{0.2\bar{5}~mol~AgNO_3}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.3\bar{0}60~\mathrm{L} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.31~\mathrm{L} \end{align*} \]
A solution of ethanol (C2H6O) in water is prepared by dissolving 70.0 mL of ethanol (ρ = 0.79 g cm−3) in enough water to make a 250.0 mL solution. What is the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of the ethanol in this solution?
Solution
Answer: [C2H6O] = 4.8 mol L−1
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity
The goal is to find the molar concentration of ethanol (EtOH), which is its moles divided by the total volume of the solution. We can find the moles of ethanol by using its volume and density to find its mass, and then using its molar mass. Note that 1 cm3 is exactly equal to 1 mL.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{C_2H_6O}) &= n(\mathrm{C_2H_6O}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{C_2H_6O}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_2H_6O})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= V(\mathrm{C_2H_6O}) ~ \rho(\mathrm{C_2H_6O}) ~ M(\mathrm{C_2H_6O})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 70.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{cm^3}}{\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{0.7\bar{9}~g}}{\mathrm{cm^3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~C_2H_6O}}{46.0\bar{8}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{250.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 4.\bar{8}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 4.8~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
If all of the chloride in a 4.105 g sample of an unknown metal chloride is precipitated as AgCl with 70.80 mL of 0.2000 M AgNO3, what is the percentage (by mass) of chloride in the sample?
Solution
Answer: 12.23 %
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; percent composition by mass
Here is a generic chemical equation describing the chemistry that is occurring. The key stoichiometric relationship is that one mole of AgNO3 reacts to precipitate one mole of Cl– as AgCl.
\[ \mathrm{M}_x\mathrm{Cl}_y(\mathrm{aq}) + \mathrm{AgNO_3(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{M}_x(\mathrm{NO_3})_y(\mathrm{aq}) + \mathrm{AgCl(s)} \]
The goal is to find the mass of chloride in the sample and divide it by the total mass of the sample. We can find the mass of chloride by relating it to the amount of AgNO3 required for complete precipitation.
\[ \begin{align*} w(\mathrm{Cl^-})~\% &= w(\mathrm{Cl^-}) \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ M(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{AgCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,AgCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,AgCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,AgCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ m(\mathrm{sample})^{-1} \times 100~\%\\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.200\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{70.8\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}}{\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{35.4\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{4.10\bar{5}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \times 100~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 12.2\bar{2}83~\% \\[1.5ex] &= 12.23~\% \end{align*} \]
A 0.685 g sample of an unknown diprotic acid requires a 42.57 mL 0.5188 M aqueous NaOH solution to be completely neutralized. What is the molar mass (in g mol–1) of the acid?
Solution
Answer: 62.0 g mol–1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction
The problem describes an acid-base neutralization reaction. Since the acid is diprotic (donated as H2X), it will react with two equivalents of sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{H_2X(aq)} + \mathrm{2~NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{Na_2X(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the molar mass of the acid, which is its mass divided by its moles. We can find the moles of the acid by relating it stoichiometrically to the moles of NaOH used in the titration.
\[ \begin{align*} M(\mathrm{H_2X}) &= m(\mathrm{H_2X}) ~ n(\mathrm{H_2X})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{H_2X}) ~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{H_2X,NaOH}) \biggr]^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{H_2X}) ~ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution}) ~ r(\mathrm{H_2X,NaOH}) \biggr]^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.68\bar{5}~\mathrm{g~H_2X} ~ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.518\bar{8}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{42.5\bar{7}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~H_2X}}{2~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \biggr]^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 62.\bar{0}3~\mathrm{g~mol^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 62.0~\mathrm{g~mol^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
The calculated molar mass (62.0 g mol−1) is a very close match to the molar mass of carbonic acid (H2CO3), which is 62.02 g mol−1.
What mass (in g) of Na2CrO4 is required to precipitate all of the silver ions from a 75.0 mL 0.150 M aqueous solution of AgNO3?
Solution
Answer: 0.911 g Na2CrO4
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; precipitation
This problem involves a precipitation reaction where silver ions (Ag+) from AgNO3 react with chromate ions (CrO42−) from Na2CrO4 to form a solid precipitate, Ag2CrO4.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Na_2CrO_4(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{AgNO_3(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~NaNO_3(aq)} + \mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4(s)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the mass of Na2CrO4 required. We can find the moles of AgNO3 from its volume and concentration, use the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of Na2CrO4 needed, and then convert to mass.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) &= n(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4,AgNO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4,AgNO_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.15\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{75.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{2~mol~AgNO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{161.9\bar{8}~\mathrm{g~Na_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.91\bar{1}13~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.911~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
Which of the following aqueous solutions contains the largest number of ions?
- 100.0 mL of 0.200 M NaOH
- 50.0 mL of 0.300 M BaCl2
- 75.0 mL of 0.175 M Na3PO4
Solution
Answer: C
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; ions
a. 100.0 mL of 0.200 M NaOH
Sodium hydroxide dissociates into two ions (i = 2).
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Na^+(aq)} + \mathrm{OH^-(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{ions}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{100.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{1} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~ions}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0400~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
b. 50.0 mL of 0.300 M BaCl2
Barium chloride dissociates into three ions (i = 3).
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{BaCl_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ba^{2+}(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{ions}) &= n(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,BaCl_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{BaCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,BaCl_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.30\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{50.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{3~\mathrm{mol~ions}}{\mathrm{mol~BaCl_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0450~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
c. 75.0 mL of 0.175 M Na3PO4
Sodium phosphate dissociates into four ions (i = 4).
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Na_3PO_4(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{3~Na^+(aq)} + \mathrm{PO_4{^{3-}}(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{ions}) &= n(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,Na_3PO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{ions,Na_3PO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.17\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{75.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{1} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{4~\mathrm{mol~ions}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0525~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Comparing the moles of ions, the solution of Na3PO4 (c) contains the largest number of ions.
A 45.0 mL sample of HCl(aq) requires 24.16 mL of 0.106 M NaOH for complete neutralization. What is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of the original HCl(aq) solution?
Solution
Answer: 0.0569 mol L−1 HCl(aq)
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction
This is a neutralization reaction between a strong acid and a strong base, which react in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the concentration of the HCl solution. We can find the moles of NaOH used from its volume and concentration, use the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of HCl that reacted, and then divide by the initial volume of the HCl solution. This can all be done in a single calculation chain.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{HCl}) &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{HCl})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,NaOH})~ V(\mathrm{HCl})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,NaOH})~ V(\mathrm{HCl})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.10\bar{6}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{24.1\bar{6}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{45.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~HCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.056\bar{9}10~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0569~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Combine a 55.0 mL 1.10 M aqueous silver nitrate solution with a 25.0 mL 0.65 M sodium chloride solution. What mass (in g) of silver chloride is produced?
Solution
Answer: 2.3 g AgCl
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; solubility rules; limiting reactant
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{AgNO_3(aq)} + \mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{AgCl(s)} + \mathrm{NaNO_3(aq)} \end{align*} \]
Find the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{AgCl}) &= n(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,AgNO_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,AgNO_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{55.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~AgNO_3}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}}{\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.060\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{AgCl}) &= n(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,NaCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{AgCl,NaCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.6\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{25.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}}{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.01\bar{6}25~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
NaCl is limiting.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{AgCl}) &= n(\mathrm{AgCl}) ~ M(\mathrm{AgCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.01\bar{6}25~\mathrm{mol} \left ( \dfrac{143.3\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~AgCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 2.\bar{3}28~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 2.3~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
What mass (in g) of NaOH is required to completely react with a 35.0 mL 2.2 M aqueous H2SO4 solution?
Solution
Answer: 6.2 g NaOH
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction
This is an acid-base neutralization reaction. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is a diprotic acid, so it requires two moles of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for complete neutralization.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{H_2SO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{2~NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{Na_2SO_4(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the mass of NaOH. We can do this by finding the moles of H2SO4 from its volume and concentration, then using the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of NaOH, and finally converting to mass.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{NaOH}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ M(\mathrm{NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,H_2SO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,H_2SO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{2.\bar{2}~\mathrm{mol~H_2SO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{35.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~H_2SO_4}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{mol~H_2SO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{40.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.\bar{1}60~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 6.2~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
You have 75.0 mL of a 1.50 M aqueous solution of Na2CrO4 and 125.0 mL of a 1.15 M aqueous solution of AgNO3. Calculate the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of CrO42− after the two solutions are mixed together.
Solution
Answer: [CrO42−] = 0.20 mol L−1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; solubility rules; limiting reactant
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Na_2CrO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{2~AgNO_3(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4(s)} + \mathrm{2~NaNO_3(aq)} \end{align*} \]
Find the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4}) &= n(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4,Na_2CrO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4,Na_2CrO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{75.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~Na_2CrO_4}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Ag_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.12\bar{2}50~\mathrm{mol} \\[3.0ex] n(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4}) &= n(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4,AgNO_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{AgNO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4,AgNO_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.1\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~AgNO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{125.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~AgNO_3}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Ag_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{2~mol~AgNO_3}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.071\bar{8}75~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
AgNO3 is limiting.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{CrO_4{^{2-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{CrO_4{^{2-}}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4})_{\mathrm{leftover}} ~ r(\mathrm{CrO_4{^{2-}},Na_2CrO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{CrO_4{^{2-}},Na_2CrO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4}) \biggr] ~ - ~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Ag_2CrO_4})_{\mathrm{formed}} ~ r(\mathrm{Na_2CrO_4,Ag_2CrO_4}) \biggr] \Biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{CrO_4{^{2-}},Na_2CrO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{1.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{75.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~Na_2CrO_4}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ 0.071\bar{8}75~\mathrm{mol~Ag_2CrO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}}{\mathrm{mol~Ag_2CrO_4}} \right ) \biggr] \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CrO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(75.\bar{0} + 125.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \left ( 0.11\bar{2}5 - 0.071\bar{8}75 \right )~\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4} \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CrO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(75.\bar{0} + 125.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( 0.04\bar{0}62~\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~CrO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2CrO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{200.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.2\bar{0}31~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.20~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Sulfamic acid (HSO3NH2) is a strong monoprotic acid that can be used to standardize a strong base. A 1.790 g sample of HSO3NH2 is required to completely neutralize a 190.4 mL aqueous KOH solution. What is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of the KOH solution?
Solution
Answer: 0.0968 mol L−1 KOH(aq)
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base neutralization reaction
This is an acid-base neutralization reaction between a strong monoprotic acid and a strong base, which react in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HSO_3NH_2(aq)} + \mathrm{KOH} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{KSO_3NH_2(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the concentration of the KOH solution. We can do this by finding the moles of the primary standard acid (HSO3NH2) from its mass, using the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of KOH that reacted, and then dividing by the volume of the KOH solution.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{KOH}) &= n(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HSO_3NH_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{KOH,HSO_3NH_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{HSO_3NH_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{HSO_3NH_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{KOH,HSO_3NH_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.79\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~HSO_3NH_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~HSO_3NH_2}}{97.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~KOH}}{\mathrm{mol~HSO_3NH_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{190.\bar{4}~mL~KOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.096\bar{8}20~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0968~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Chemist’s Note: A key feature of sulfamic acid is that it is a stable, crystalline solid at room temperature, which makes it an excellent primary standard. This means you can weigh it out very accurately to make a solution of a precise concentration, which is then used to determine the exact concentration of another solution (like KOH).
You mix 275.0 mL of 1.22 M aqueous lead(II) nitrate with 310.0 mL of 1.56 M aqueous potassium iodide. Determine the following.
- the balanced molecular equation for this reaction
- the limiting reactant
- the final molar concentration (in mol L–1) of Pb2+
- the mass (in g) of lead(II) iodide formed
- the final molar concentration (in mol L–1) of K+
- the final molar concentration (in mol L–1) of NO3–
Solution
Answer:
- Pb(NO3)2(aq) + 2 KI(aq) → PbI2(s) + 2 KNO3(aq)
- KI
- [Pb2+] = 0.160 mol L–1
- 111 g PbI2(s)
- [K+] = 0.827 mol L–1
- [NO3–] = 1.15 mol L–1
Concept: solubility rules; stoichiometry; molarity; limiting reactant
a. Balanced Molecular Equation
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2(aq)} + \mathrm{2~KI(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{PbI_2(s)} + \mathrm{2~KNO_3(aq)} \end{align*} \]
b. Limiting Reactant
To find the limiting reactant, calculate the moles of PbI2 that can be formed from each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{PbI_2}) &= n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{PbI_2,Pb(NO_3)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{PbI_2,Pb(NO_3)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 275.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~Pb(NO_3)_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.2\bar{2}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbI_2}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.33\bar{5}50~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{PbI_2}) &= n(\mathrm{KI}) ~ r(\mathrm{PbI_2,KI}) \\[1.5ex] &= V(\mathrm{KI}) ~ c(\mathrm{KI}) ~ r(\mathrm{PbI_2,KI}) \\[1.5ex] &= 310.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~KI} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.5\bar{6}~\mathrm{mol~KI}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbI_2}}{2~\mathrm{mol~KI}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.24\bar{1}80~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since KI produces fewer moles of product, KI is the limiting reactant.
c. Final Molar Concentration of Pb2+
Since the product, PbI2, is not soluble in water, the only dissolved Pb2+ ions come from the unreacted Pb(NO3)2 reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}})_{\mathrm{final}} &= n(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}})_{\mathrm{remaining}} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{remaining}} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+},Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+},Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{PbI_2})_{\mathrm{formed}} ~~ r(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2, PbI_2}) ~ \biggr] \Biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+},Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{\biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{1.2\bar{2}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{275.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ \left ( 0.24\bar{1}80~\mathrm{mol~PbI_2} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{mol~PbI_2}} \right ) \biggr]\Biggl\}\\ &\phantom{= \Biggl\{} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(275.\bar{0} + 310.\bar{0}) ~\mathrm{mL~solution}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggr[ \left ( 0.33\bar{5}0 - 0.24\bar{1}80 \right )~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2} \biggr] \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{585.\bar{0}0 ~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( 0.09\bar{3}70~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{585.\bar{0}0 ~\mathrm{mL~solution}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.16\bar{0}17~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.160~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
d. Mass of Lead(II) Iodide Formed
Use the amount of PbI2 formed from part (b) where we determined the amount of PbI2 that could be created.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{PbI_2}) &= n(\mathrm{PbI_2})_{\mathrm{formed}} ~ M(\mathrm{PbI_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.24\bar{1}80~\mathrm{mol~PbI_2} ~ \left ( \dfrac{461.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{mol~PbI_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 11\bar{1}.46~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 111~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
e. Final Molar Concentration of K+
K+ is a spectator ion. Its concentration is its initial moles diluted by the total final volume.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{K^+}) &= n(\mathrm{K^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{KNO_3})_{\mathrm{formed}} ~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KNO_3})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{KI}) ~ r(\mathrm{KNO_3,KI})~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KNO_3})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{KI}) ~ V(\mathrm{KI}) ~ r(\mathrm{KNO_3,KI})~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KNO_3})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.5\bar{6}~\mathrm{mol~KI}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{310.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~KNO_3}}{2~\mathrm{mol~KI}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~K^+}}{\mathrm{mol~KNO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(275.0 + 310.0)~\mathrm{mL~solution}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.82\bar{6}66~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.827~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
f. Final Molar Concentration of NO3–
The dissolved K+ spectator ions are present due to the presence of KNO3 and unreacted Pb(NO3)2, both soluble ionic compounds. Because all of the nitrate ions originate from the starting reactant, Pb(NO3)2, and remain in solution, we can determine the final nitrate ion concentration from the original molar concentration of Pb(NO3)2.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}}) &= n(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Pb(NO_3)_2})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.2\bar{2}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{275.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle 2~\mathrm{mol~NO_3{^{-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(275.\bar{0} + 310.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL~solution}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 1.1\bar{4}70~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.15~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
A student performs a titration to standardize a stock solution of NaOH. They weigh out a 1.250 g sample of pure KHP (potassium hydrogen phthalate, M(KHP) = 204.22 g mol−1, a monoprotic acid), dissolve it in water, and find that it requires 75.0 mL of the NaOH solution to completely neutralize the acid. What is the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of the stock NaOH solution? (KHP is a monoprotic acid).
Solution
Answer: 0.0816 mol L−1 NaOH(aq) stock solution
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base neutralization reaction
This is an acid-base neutralization reaction. KHP is a monoprotic acid (often abbreviated as HKP or HX), so it reacts with sodium hydroxide in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HKP(aq)} + \mathrm{NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{NaKP(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the concentration of the NaOH solution. We can find the moles of KHP from its mass, use the 1:1 ratio to find the moles of NaOH that reacted, and then divide by the volume of NaOH solution used in the titration.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NaOH}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HKP}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,HKP}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{HKP}) ~ M(\mathrm{HKP})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,HKP}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.25\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~HKP} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~HKP}}{204.2\bar{2}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{mol~HKP}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{75.\bar{0}~mL~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.081\bar{6}11~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0816~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Chemist’s Note: KHP (potassium hydrogen phthalate) is an ideal primary standard for acid-base titrations. Unlike NaOH, which readily absorbs water from the air and reacts with CO2, KHP is a stable, high-purity, non-hygroscopic solid. This means it can be weighed out with very high accuracy, allowing a chemist to prepare a solution with a precisely known number of moles of acid. This process of using a primary standard to find the exact concentration of a solution is called standardization.
What volume (in mL) of a 5.00 M hydrofluoric acid will completely react with 5.00 g of calcium hydroxide?
Solution
Answer: 27.0 mL HF(aq)
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction
This is an acid-base neutralization reaction. Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is monoprotic, while calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is dibasic, so two moles of HF are required to neutralize one mole of Ca(OH)2.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~HF(aq)} + \mathrm{Ca(OH)_2} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{CaF_2(s)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the volume of the HF solution. We can do this by finding the moles of Ca(OH)2 from its mass, then using the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of HF required, and finally converting to volume using the acid’s concentration.
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{HF}) &= n(\mathrm{HF}) ~ c(\mathrm{HF})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Ca(OH)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{HF,Ca(OH)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{HF})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Ca(OH)_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Ca(OH)_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HF,Ca(OH)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{HF})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 5.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~Ca(OH)_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Ca(OH)_2}}{74.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~HF}}{\mathrm{mol~Ca(OH)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{5.0\bar{0}~mol~HF}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 26.\bar{9}90~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 27.0~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
A 135 mL sample of 0.210 M aqueous magnesium chloride forms a precipitate when mixed with 325 mL 0.120 M aqueous sodium hydroxide.
- How much (in g) precipitate is formed?
- What is the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of the magnesium(2+) ion?
- What is the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of the sodium(1+) ion?
Solution
Answer:
- 1.14 g
- [Mg2+] = 0.0192 mol L−1
- [Na+] = 0.0848 mol L−1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity
The balanced equation for the precipitation reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{MgCl_2(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{NaOH(aq)} &\longrightarrow 2~\mathrm{NaCl(aq)} + \mathrm{Mg(OH)_2(s)} \end{align*} \]
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of the precipitate, Mg(OH)2, that can be formed from each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= n(\mathrm{MgCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,MgCl_2})\\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{MgCl_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{MgCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,MgCl_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.21\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{13\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.028\bar{3}5~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,NaOH})\\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.12\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{32\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}}{2~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.019\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since NaOH produces the lesser amount of product, NaOH is the limiting reactant.
a. Mass of Precipitate
The mass of Mg(OH)2 is determined by the moles formed from the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.019\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2} \left ( \dfrac{58.3\bar{3}~\mathrm{g~Mg(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 1.1\bar{3}74~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.14~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
b. Final Concentration of Mg2+ (Excess Reactant)
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}) &= n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \biggl\}~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{MgCl_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},MgCl_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{MgCl_2})_{\mathrm{final}}~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},MgCl_2})~ \biggr] \biggl\} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\mathrm{initial}}~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,MgCl_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2})~ r(\mathrm{MgCl_2,Mg(OH)_2})~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},MgCl_2}) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{MgCl_2})_{\mathrm{initial}}~ V(\mathrm{MgCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},MgCl_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2})~ r(\mathrm{MgCl_2,Mg(OH)_2})~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},MgCl_2}) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.21\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{13\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}} \right ) \biggr] - \\ &\phantom{=}~~~~~ \biggr[ \left ( 0.019\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~MgCl_2}} \right ) \biggr] \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{1}{(13\bar{5} + 32\bar{5})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \left ( 0.028\bar{3}50 - 0.019\bar{5}00 \right )~\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}} \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{1}{46\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ 0.0088\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}} \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{1}{46\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.019\bar{2}39~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0192~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
c. Final Concentration of Na+ (Spectator Ion)
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Na^+}) &= n(\mathrm{Na^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.12\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{32\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na^+}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(13\bar{5} + 32\bar{5})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.084\bar{7}82~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0848~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
A solution is prepared by dissolving 12.8 g ammonium sulfate in enough water to make 100.0 mL of stock solution. A 10.00 mL aliquot is taken and 50.00 mL of water is added. What is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of ammonium ions and sulfate ions in the final solution?
Solution
Answer:
- [NH4+] = 0.323 mol L–1
- [SO42–] = 0.161 mol L–1
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; dilution
The strategy is to find the final concentration of each ion in the diluted solution. The final volume is the sum of the aliquot volume and the added water volume: 10.0 mL + 50.0 mL = 60.0 mL.
Final Concentration of NH4+
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NH_4{^+}}) &= n(\mathrm{NH_4{^+}})_{\textrm{dilute aliquot}} ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NH_4{^+}})_{\textrm{stock solution}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2SO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2SO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{NH_4{^+},(NH_4)_2SO_4})\\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=}~~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 12.\bar{8}~\mathrm{g~(NH_4)_2SO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2SO_4}}{132.1\bar{6}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{2~mol~NH_4{^+}}}{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2SO_4}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=(} \left ( \dfrac{1}{100.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~stock~solution}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~aliquot}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{60.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~dilute~aliquot}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.32\bar{2}84~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.323~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Final Concentration of SO42−
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}})_{\textrm{dilute~aliquot}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}})_{\textrm{stock~solution}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1}~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2SO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2SO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}},(NH_4)_2SO_4})\\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=}~~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 12.\bar{8}~\mathrm{g~(NH_4)_2SO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2SO_4}}{132.16~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2SO_4}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=(} \left ( \dfrac{1}{100.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{60.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.16\bar{1}42~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}}\\[1.5ex] &= 0.161~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Alternatively…
Once the final concentration of one ion is known, the concentration of the other ion can be found directly from the salt’s 2:1 stoichiometry.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) &= c(\mathrm{NH_4^+}) ~ r(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}},NH_4{^+}}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left( \dfrac{0.32\bar{2}84~\mathrm{mol~NH_4{^+}}}{\mathrm{L}} \right) \left( \dfrac{1~\mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}}{\displaystyle 2~\mathrm{mol~NH_4{^+}}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.16\bar{1}42~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.161~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
If 175 mL of a 0.125 M aqueous NaCl solution and 275 mL of a 0.575 M aqueous Na2SO4 solution are mixed, determine the molar concentrations (in mol L−1) of the following:
- chloride ions
- sulfate ions
- sodium ions
Solution
Answer:
- [Cl−] = 0.0486 mol L−1
- [SO42−] = 0.351 mol L−1
- [Na+] = 0.767 mol L−1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity
First, we must determine if a reaction occurs by considering the potential products of a double displacement reaction. The reactants are NaCl and Na2SO4. The potential products would be the same two salts. According to solubility rules, all sodium compounds are soluble. Since no precipitate, gas, or weak electrolyte is formed, no reaction occurs and no limiting reactant exists.
The problem is a dilution calculation for each of the three spectator ions present in the mixture.
a. Final Molar Concentration of Cl−
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= n(\mathrm{Cl^-}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Cl^-,NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.12\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{17\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Cl^-}}{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(17\bar{5} + 27\bar{5})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.048\bar{6}11~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0486~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
b. Final Molar Concentration of SO42−
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{SO_4{^{2-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{SO_4^{2-}})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Na_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{Na_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{SO_4^{2-},Na_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.57\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~Na_2SO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{27\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~SO_4{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2SO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(17\bar{5} + 27\bar{5})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.35\bar{1}38~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.351~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
c. Final Molar Concentration of Na+ (Common Ion)
The total moles of Na+ is the sum of the moles from both initial solutions.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Na^+}) &= n(\mathrm{Na^+})~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{NaCl}) + n(\mathrm{Na_2SO_4}) \biggl\}~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaCl}) ~ \biggr] ~+~ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{Na_2SO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{Na_2SO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,Na_2SO_4}) ~ \biggr] \biggl\} ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.12\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{17\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na^+}}{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right ) \biggr] ~+~ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.57\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~Na_2SO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{27\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{2~\mathrm{mol~Na^+}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_2SO_4}} \right ) \biggr] \biggl\} \\ &\phantom{=}~~~~ \left ( \dfrac{1}{(17\bar{5} + 27\bar{5})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \left ( 0.02\bar{8}75 + 0.31\bar{6}25 \right )~\mathrm{mol~Na^+} \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{1}{45\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ 0.34\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol~Na^+} \biggl\} \left ( \dfrac{1}{45\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{10^3~mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.76\bar{6}66~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.767~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
What mass (in g) of iron(III) hydroxide precipitate can be produced by reacting a 62.0 mL 0.105 M aqueous iron(III) nitrate solution with a 125 mL 0.150 M aqueous sodium hydroxide solution?
Solution
Answer: 0.668 g
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; precipitation; limiting reactant
This problem involves a precipitation reaction between iron(III) nitrate and sodium hydroxide. The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Fe(NO_3)_3(aq)} + 3~\mathrm{NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Fe(OH)_3(s)} + \mathrm{3~NaNO_3(aq)} \end{align*} \]
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of the precipitate, Fe(OH)3, that can be formed from each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3}) &= n(\mathrm{Fe(NO_3)_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3,Fe(NO_3)_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Fe(NO_3)_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3,Fe(NO_3)_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.10\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~Fe(NO_3)_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{62.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Fe(OH)_3}}{\mathrm{mol~Fe(NO_3)_3}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.5\bar{1}00 \times 10^{-3}~\mathrm{mol}\\[3ex] n(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.15\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{12\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Fe(OH)_3}}{\mathrm{3~mol~NaOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.2\bar{5}00 \times 10^{-3}~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since NaOH produces the lesser amount of product, NaOH is the limiting reactant. The reaction will produce 6.25 × 10−3 mol of Fe(OH)3.
Now, calculate the mass of the Fe(OH)3 precipitate.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3}) &= n(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3}) ~ M(\mathrm{Fe(OH)_3}) \\[1.5ex] &= 6.2\bar{5}00 \times 10^{-3}~\mathrm{mol~Fe(OH)_3} \left ( \dfrac{106.8\bar{8}~\mathrm{g~Fe(OH)_3}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.66\bar{8}00~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.668~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
A 2.50 g sample of phosphoric acid is added to a 150.0 mL 1.00 M sodium hydroxide solution to give a 151.5 mL mixture and the acid is completely neutralized. Determine the following:
- [Na+] (in mol L−1)
- [PO43−] (in mol L−1)
- [OH−] (in mol L−1)
Solution
Answer:
- [Na+] = 0.990 mol L−1
- [PO43−] = 0.168 mol L−1
- [OH−] = 0.49 mol L−1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction; limiting reactant
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{H_3PO_4(aq)} + \mathrm{3~NaOH} \longrightarrow \mathrm{3~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{Na_3PO_4(aq)} \end{align*} \]
Determine the limiting reagent.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) &= n(\mathrm{H_3PO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4,H_3PO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{H_3PO_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{H_3PO_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4, H_3PO_4}) \\[1.5ex] &= 2.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~H_3PO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~H_3PO_4}}{\mathrm{98.0\bar{0}~g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4}}{\mathrm{mol~H_3PO_4}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.025\bar{5}10~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4,NaOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{150.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~NaOH}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4}}{\mathrm{3~mol~NaOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.050\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since H3PO4 produces fewer moles of product, H3PO4 is the limiting reactant.
A
The Na+ ions are spectators from the initial NaOH. Their total moles remain constant, but the volume changes.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Na^+}) &= n(\mathrm{Na^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NaOH})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaOH})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ V(\mathrm{NaOH})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{1.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{150.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~NaOH}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle 1~\mathrm{mol~Na^+}}{1~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right) \left ( \dfrac{1}{151.\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL~solution}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.99\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.990~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
B
All the H3PO4 is converted to PO43– (as Na3PO4).
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{PO_4{^{3-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{PO_4{^{3-}}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1}\\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{PO_4{^{3-}},Na_3PO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution}^{-1})\\[1.5ex] &= 0.025\bar{5}10~\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4} \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~PO_4{^{3-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{151.\bar{5}~\mathrm{mL}}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.16\bar{8}38~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.168~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
C
The final moles of OH– is the initial amount minus the amount that reacted with the acid.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{OH^-}) &= n(\mathrm{OH^-}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{NaOH})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{NaOH})_{\mathrm{consumed}} \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{OH^-,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{NaOH})~ V(\mathrm{NaOH}) \biggr] ~ - ~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Na_3PO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,Na_3PO_4}) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{OH^-,NaOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ \dfrac{1.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \left ( \dfrac{150.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ 0.025\bar{5}10~\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4} \left ( \dfrac{3~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{mol~Na_3PO_4}} \right ) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~OH^-}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{151.\bar{5}~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \left ( 0.15\bar{0} ~-~ 0.076\bar{5}30 \right )~\mathrm{mol~NaOH} \biggl\} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{\displaystyle mol~OH^-}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{151.\bar{5}~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( 0.07\bar{3}47~\mathrm{mol~NaOH} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~OH^-}}{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{\mathrm{151.\bar{5}~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.4\bar{8}49~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.49~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
A stock solution with a total volume of 1000.0 mL contains 35.0 g Mg(NO3)2. If you take a 20.0 mL aliquot and then dilute it with water to a total volume of 500.0 mL, what is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of Mg2+ and NO3– in the final solution?
Solution
Answer:
- [Mg2+] = 9.43 × 10−3
- [NO3−] = 1.89 × 10−2
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; dilution
The strategy is to find the final concentration of each ion in the diluted solution. This can be done in a single calculation chain by determining the initial moles of the salt in the stock solution, finding the fraction of those moles transferred in the aliquot, and then dividing by the final diluted volume.
Final Concentration of Mg2+
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}) &= n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\textrm{dilute aliquot}} ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\textrm{stock solution}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 35.\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~Mg(NO_3)_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{148.3\bar{3}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{1000.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{20.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{500.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0094\bar{3}84~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 9.43\times 10^{-3}~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Final Concentration of NO3–
The calculation for the nitrate ion follows the same logic, but uses the 2:1 mole ratio between NO3– and Mg(NO3)2.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}}) &= n(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}})_{\textrm{dilute~aliquot}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}})_{\textrm{stock~solution}} ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1}~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{stock~solution})^{-1} ~ V(\mathrm{aliquot}) ~ V(\mathrm{dilute~aliquot})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 35.\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~Mg(NO_3)_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{148.3\bar{3}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{\displaystyle 2~mol~NO_3{^-}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{1000.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{20.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{500.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.018\bar{8}76~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.89 \times 10^{-2}~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Alternatively…
Once the final concentration of one ion is known, the concentration of the other ion can be found directly from the salt’s stoichiometry, as their ratio in the solution must be the same as in the chemical formula.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NO_3{^{-}}}) &= c(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\mathrm{dilute~aliquot}} ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Mg^{2+}}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.0094\bar{3}84~\mathrm{mol}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle 2~\mathrm{mol~NO_3{^{-}}}}{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.018\bar{8}76~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 1.89 \times 10^{-2}~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Determine the molar concentrations (in mol L–1) of the ions present in a solution created from mixing equal volumes of 0.50 M aqueous lead(II) nitrate and 0.50 M aqueous sodium chloride solutions? Assume that the volumes are precise to one decimal place in normalized scientific notation.
Solution
Answer:
- [Pb2+] = 0.12 mol L−1
- [NO3−] = 0.50 mol L−1
- [Na+] = 0.25 L−1
- [Cl−] = 0 mol L−1
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; dilution; limiting reactant
1. Balanced Equation and Initial Moles
The balanced equation for the precipitation reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2(aq)} + 2~\mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{PbCl_2(s)} + 2~\mathrm{NaNO_3(aq)} \end{align*} \]
This solution assumes a 1.0 L of each solution is mixed for a total volume of 2.0 L.
Because the problem specifies mixing “equal volumes,” the final ion concentrations are independent of the actual starting volume chosen. The volume acts as a simple scaling factor that cancels out in the final moles/volume calculation. By choosing a convenient volume like 1.0 L, we make the mole calculations more straightforward without changing the final answer.
To determine which reactant is limiting, we calculate the moles of precipitate (PbCl2) that could be formed from each of the initial reactants. The reactant that produces the smaller amount of product is the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{PbCl_2}) &= c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{PbCl_2,Pb(NO_3)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbCl_2}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.5\bar{0}0~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{PbCl_2}) &= c(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaCl})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{PbCl_2,NaCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~PbCl_2}}{2~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.2\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
NaCl is the limiting reactant.
The final concentration of the excess reactant ion, Pb2+, is calculated from the number of moles that remain in solution after the precipitation is complete. This is found by subtracting the moles that reacted from the initial moles, and then dividing by the total final volume of the mixture.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) &= n(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}, Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{PbCl_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2,PbCl_2}) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{Pb^{2+}, Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ \biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{} \right ) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ 0.2\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol~PbCl_2} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{mol~PbCl_2}} \right ) \biggr] \biggl\} ~ \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}\right )\\[1.5ex] &= \left [ \left ( 0.5\bar{0} - 0.2\bar{5}0 \right ) ~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2} \right ] \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}\right )\\[1.5ex] &= \left ( 0.2\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Pb^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}\right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.1\bar{2}50~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.12~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
The nitrate ion, NO3–, is a spectator ion, meaning it does not participate in the reaction. Its final concentration is determined by its initial moles diluted into the total final volume.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NO_3{^{-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{NO_3{^{-}}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Pb(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^{-}},Pb(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle 2~\mathrm{mol~NO_3{^{-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~Pb(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.5\bar{0}0~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Similarly, the sodium ion, Na+, is a spectator ion. Its final concentration is determined by its initial moles diluted into the total final volume.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Na^+}) &= n(\mathrm{Na^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{NaCl})_{\mathrm{initial}} ~ r(\mathrm{Na^+,NaCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~Na^+}}{\mathrm{mol~NaCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.2\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Because NaCl was identified as the limiting reactant, we assume that all of the chloride ions are consumed in the reaction to form the solid PbCl2 precipitate.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Cl^-}) &= 0~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
A precipitate forms when titanium(IV) chloride is added to water. Two water molecules react and form four HCl molecules. What is the identity of the precipitate?
- What is the identity of the precipitate?
- What is the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of H+ ions if 3.00 g of TiCl4 was added to enough water to give a 100.0 mL solution?
Solution
Answer:
- TiO2(s)
- 0.633 mol L−1 H+(aq)
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity
a. Identity of the Precipitate
By taking an inventory of the atoms in the given reactants (TiCl4 and 2 H2O) and the known product (4 HCl), we can deduce that the unknown precipitate must contain 1 Ti atom and 2 O atoms. The precipitate is therefore TiO2(s).
The complete balanced equation is: \[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{TiCl_4(s)} + 2~\mathrm{H_2O(l)} &\longrightarrow 4~\mathrm{HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{TiO_2(s)} \end{align*} \]
b. Molar Concentration of H+
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{H^+}) &= n(\mathrm{H^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{H^+,HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{TiCl_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,TiCl_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{H^+,HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= m(\mathrm{TiCl_4}) ~ M(\mathrm{TiCl_4})^{-1} ~ r(\mathrm{HCl,TiCl_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{H^+,HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 3.0\bar{0}~\mathrm{g~TiCl_4} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~TiCl_4}}{189.6\bar{7}~\mathrm{g}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{4~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{mol~TiCl_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~H^+}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \biggr[ 100.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \biggr]^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.63\bar{2}67~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.633~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
The vigorous reaction described in this problem is a classic example of the hydrolysis of a metal halide. “Hydrolysis” literally means “splitting by water” (hydro- + -lysis).
This reaction is common for halides containing small, highly charged metal cations, such as Ti4+, Al3+, and Sn4+. The high charge density of these metal ions strongly attracts the negative (oxygen) end of the polar water molecules. This M–O interaction is so strong that it weakens the O–H bonds within the water molecule, causing the water to “split” and release H+ ions. These protons then combine with the chloride ions (Cl–) from the metal halide to form aqueous HCl.
The final result is the formation of a stable, insoluble metal oxide (like TiO2) and a strong acid. This is why many metal halides, like titanium(IV) chloride and aluminum chloride, are powerful Lewis acids and must be stored in very dry conditions, as they will fume corrosively in moist air.
It is worth noting that while HCl(aq) is listed as a product of reaction, HCl(aq) is a strong acid and will not exist in water. It will react with water to create hydronium ions and hydroxide ions in equal amounts.
Determine the molar concentrations (in mol L−1) the ions present in a solution created from mixing equal volumes of 0.75 M aqueous ammonium carbonate and 0.75 M aqueous potassium perchlorate. Assume that the volumes are precise to one decimal place in normalized scientific notation.
Solution
Answer:
- [NH4+] = 0.5 mol L−1
- [CO32−] = 0.38 mol L−1
- [K+] = 0.38 mol L–1
- [ClO4−] = 0.38 mol L−1
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; dilution
The problem involves mixing two soluble ionic compounds: ammonium carbonate, (NH4)2CO3, and potassium perchlorate, KClO4. To determine if a reaction occurs, we must consider the potential products of a double displacement reaction: ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4) and potassium carbonate (K2CO3).
According to the solubility rules:
All ammonium (NH4+) compounds are soluble.
All potassium (K+) compounds are soluble.
Since all possible products are also soluble in water, no precipitation occurs, and therefore there is no reaction. The final solution is simply a mixture of the four dissociated ions, each diluted by the presence of the other solution.
Choose a Starting Volume
This solution assumes 1.0 L of each solution is mixed, for a total final volume of 2.0 L. Since we are mixing equal volumes, the concentration of each initial salt is halved.
Because the problem specifies mixing “equal volumes,” the final ion concentrations are independent of the actual starting volume chosen. The volume acts as a simple scaling factor that cancels out in the final moles/volume calculation. By choosing a convenient volume like 1.0 L, we make the mole calculations more straightforward without changing the final answer.
Ammonium Ion [NH4+]:
The initial salt is (NH4)2CO3, which produces two moles of NH4+.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NH_4{^+}}) &= n(\mathrm{NH_4{^+}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{NH_4{^{+}},(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{NH_4{^{+}},(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \dfrac{0.7\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2CO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{2~mol~NH_4{^{+}}}}{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2CO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.7\bar{5}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.75~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Carbonate Ion [CO32−]:
The initial salt produces one mole of CO32−.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{CO_3{^{2-}}}) &= n(\mathrm{CO_3{^{2-}}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{CO_3{^{2-}},(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ r(\mathrm{CO_3{^{2-}},(NH_4)_2CO_3}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \dfrac{0.7\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2CO_3}}{\mathrm{L}} \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~CO_3{^{2-}}}}{\mathrm{mol~(NH_4)_2CO_3}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.3\bar{7}5~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.38~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Potassium Ion [K+]:
The initial salt KClO4 produces one mole of K+.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{K^+}) &= n(\mathrm{K^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.7\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~KClO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~K^+}}{\mathrm{mol~KClO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.3\bar{7}5~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.38~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Perchlorate Ion [ClO4−]:
The initial salt KClO4 produces one mole of ClO4−.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{ClO_4{^-}}) &= n(\mathrm{ClO_4{^-}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{ClO_4{^-},KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{KClO_4}) ~ r(\mathrm{ClO_4{^-},KClO_4}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.7\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~KClO_4}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{mol~ClO_4{^-}}}{\mathrm{mol~KClO_4}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{2.\bar{0}~\mathrm{L}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.3\bar{7}5~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.38~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
What volume (in mL) of each of the following bases will will completely react with 50.0 mL of 0.200 M HCl?
- 0.100 M NaOH
- 0.0500 M Sr(OH)2
- 0.250 M KOH
Solution
Answer:
- 100. mL NaOH
- 100. mL Sr(OH)2
- 40.0 mL KOH
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base neutralization reaction
a. 0.100 M NaOH
The neutralization reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{NaOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{NaCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{NaOH}) &= n(\mathrm{NaOH}) ~ c(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{NaOH,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{NaOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{50.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~NaOH}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{0.10\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~NaOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 10\bar{0}.00~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 100.~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
b. 0.0500 M Sr(OH)2
Strontium hydroxide is a diacidic base, requiring two moles of HCl.
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{Sr(OH)_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{SrCl_2(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2}) &= n(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{Sr(OH)_2})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{50.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Sr(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{2~mol~HCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{0.050\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Sr(OH)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 10\bar{0}.00~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 100.~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
c. 0.250 M KOH
The neutralization reaction is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{KOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{KCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{KOH}) &= n(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ c(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{KOH,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{KOH,HCl}) ~ c(\mathrm{KOH})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{50.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~KOH}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{0.25\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~KOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 40.\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 40.0~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
Determine the molar concentration (in mol L−1) of the salt produced by a reaction between a 250. mL 0.10 M aqueous HCl solution with a 150. mL 0.50 M aqueous KOH solution.
Solution
Answer: [KCl] = 0.0625 mol L−1
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction; limiting reactant
This is a neutralization reaction between a strong acid (HCl) and a strong base (KOH), which react in a 1:1 ratio to produce water and a salt, potassium chloride (KCl).
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{HCl(aq)} + \mathrm{KOH(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{KCl(aq)} \end{align*} \]
First, determine the limiting reactant by calculating the moles of the salt (KCl) that can be produced from each reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{KCl}) &= n(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ r(\mathrm{KCl,HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{HCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{KCl,HCl}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.1\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~HCl}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{25\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~KCl}}{\mathrm{mol~HCl}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.02\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol} \\[3ex] n(\mathrm{KCl}) &= n(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{KCl,KOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{KCl,KOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.5\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~KOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{15\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~KCl}}{\mathrm{mol~KOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.07\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
Since HCl produces the lesser amount of product (0.0250 mol), HCl is the limiting reactant. The reaction will produce 0.0250 mol of KCl.
Now, calculate the final concentration of KCl, using the total final volume.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{KCl}) &= n(\mathrm{KCl}) ~ V(\mathrm{final})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.02\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol~KCl} \left ( \dfrac{1}{\left (25\bar{0}. + 15\bar{0}. \right ) ~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.02\bar{5}0~\mathrm{mol~KCl} \left ( \dfrac{1}{40\bar{0}.~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.06\bar{2}5~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
This problem describes the calculation at the heart of an acid-base titration, one of the most fundamental techniques in analytical chemistry. In the lab, a chemist would add one solution (the titrant) from a long, graduated tube called a buret into a flask containing the other solution (the analyte).
To know when the neutralization is complete (the “equivalence point”), a tiny amount of a chemical indicator is added to the flask. The indicator, such as phenolphthalein, dramatically changes color at a specific pH, visually signaling the exact moment the reaction is finished. The volume of titrant added is then carefully read from the buret and used in a calculation just like the one above.
What volume (in mL) of a 0.150 M aqueous HNO3 solution is required to neutralize a 50.0 mL 0.175 M aqueous Ba(OH)2 solution?
Solution
Answer: 117 mL HNO3(aq)
Concept: stoichiometry; molarity; acid-base reaction
This is a neutralization reaction between a strong acid and a strong base. Because barium hydroxide is a diacidic base, it requires two moles of the monoprotic nitric acid for complete neutralization.
The balanced chemical equation is:
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~HNO_3(aq)} + \mathrm{Ba(OH)_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~H_2O(l)} + \mathrm{Ba(NO_3)_2(aq)} \end{align*} \]
The goal is to find the volume of the HNO3 solution. This can be accomplished in a single calculation chain. Note that the L → mL conversion factors cancel out, so they can be omitted for efficiency.
\[ \begin{align*} V(\mathrm{HNO_3}) &= n(\mathrm{HNO_3}) ~ c(\mathrm{HNO_3})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Ba(OH)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{HNO_3,Ba(OH)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{HNO_3})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Ba(OH)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Ba(OH)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{HNO_3,Ba(OH)_2}) ~ c(\mathrm{HNO_3})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.17\bar{5}~\mathrm{mol~Ba(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{50.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}~\mathrm{Ba(OH)_2}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{2~mol~HNO_3}}{\mathrm{mol~Ba(OH)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{0.15\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 11\bar{6}.66~\mathrm{mL} \\[1.5ex] &= 117~\mathrm{mL} \end{align*} \]
A 120.0 mL 0.200 M aqueous potassium hydroxide solution is mixed with a 120.0 mL 0.200 M aqueous magnesium nitrate solution.
- Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction that occurs.
- Determine the precipitate that forms (if any).
- Determine the mass (in g) of precipitate that forms (if any).
- Determine the molar concentration (in mol L–1) of each ion in solution after the reaction goes to 100 % completion.
Solution
Answer:
- 2 KOH(aq) + Mg(NO3)2(aq) → 2 KNO3(aq) + Mg(OH)2(s)
- Mg(OH)2(s)
- 0.700 g Mg(OH)2(s)
- [K+] = 0.100 mol L−1; [OH−] = 0 mol L−1; [Mg2+] = 0.0500 mol L−1; [NO3−] = 0.200 mol L−1
Concept: balancing equations; stoichiometry; molarity; precipitation; limiting reactant
a. Balanced Chemical Equation
\[ \begin{align*} \mathrm{2~KOH(aq)} + \mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2(aq)} \longrightarrow \mathrm{2~KNO_3(aq)} + \mathrm{Mg(OH)_2(s)} \end{align*} \]
b. Precipitate
According to solubility rules, nitrates and potassium compounds are soluble, but magnesium hydroxide is insoluble. Therefore, the precipitate is Mg(OH)2(s).
c. Mass of Precipitate
Determine the limiting reactant.
\[ \begin{align*} n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= c(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,KOH}) \\[1.5ex] &= \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~KOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \left ( \dfrac{120.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{2~mol~KOH}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.012\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol}\\[3ex] n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= c(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{initial}) ~ r(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2,Mg(NO_3)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \left ( \dfrac{120.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{10^3~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.024\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol} \end{align*} \]
KOH is limiting.
Determine the mass of the Mg(OH)2 precipitate.
\[ \begin{align*} m(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) &= n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) ~ M(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2}) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.012\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}~ \left ( \dfrac{58.3\bar{3}~\mathrm{g~Mg(OH)_2}}{\mathrm{mol}} \right )\\[1.5ex] &= 0.69\bar{9}96~\mathrm{g} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.700~\mathrm{g} \end{align*} \]
d. Final Ion Concentrations
Molar concentration of K+ (spectator ion)
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{K^+}) &= n(\mathrm{K^+}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{KOH}) ~ r(\mathrm{K^+,KOH}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~KOH}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{120.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~K^+}}{\mathrm{mol~KOH}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(120.\bar{0} + 120.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.10\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.100~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Molar concentration of OH− (spectator ion)
Since KOH is the limiting reactant, we assume all the OH– is consumed. The final concentration is approximately 0 mol L−1.
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{OH^-}) &= 0 ~~~~\textrm{since KOH is limiting and all hydroxide precipitates as}~\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2} \end{align*} \]
Molar concentration of Mg2+ (excess reactant)
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}})_{\mathrm{final}} &= n(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \biggl\{ n(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{initial}} - n(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2})_{\mathrm{reacted}} \biggl\} ~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{ \biggr[ c(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) \biggr] ~-~ \biggr[ n(\mathrm{Mg(OH)_2})_{\mathrm{formed}}~ r(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2,Mg(OH)_2}) \biggr] \Biggl\} \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=}~~~ r(\mathrm{Mg^{2+},Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \Biggl\{\biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{120.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{10^3~mL}} \right ) \biggr] ~- \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=\Biggl\{~} ~\biggr[ \left ( \dfrac{0.012\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(OH)_2}} \right ) \biggr] \Biggl\} \\[1.5ex] &\phantom{=\biggr[} \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(120.\bar{0} + 120.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left [ \left ( 0.024\bar{0} - 0.012\bar{0} \right ) ~\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2} \right ] \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(120.\bar{0} + 120.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= \left [ 0.012\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2} \right ] \left ( \dfrac{\mathrm{mol~Mg^{2+}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(120.\bar{0} + 120.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{10^3~\mathrm{mL}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.050\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.0500~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]
Molar concentration of NO3− (spectator ion)
\[ \begin{align*} c(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}}) &= n(\mathrm{NO_3{^-}}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= n(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Mg(NO_3)_2}) V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= c(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ r(\mathrm{NO_3{^-},Mg(NO_3)_2}) ~ V(\mathrm{solution})^{-1} \\[1.5ex] &= \left ( \dfrac{0.20\bar{0}~\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}}{\mathrm{L}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{120.\bar{0}~\mathrm{mL}}{} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{\displaystyle \mathrm{2~mol~NO_3{^-}}}{\mathrm{mol~Mg(NO_3)_2}} \right ) \left ( \dfrac{1}{(120.\bar{0} + 120.\bar{0})~\mathrm{mL}} \right ) \\[1.5ex] &= 0.20\bar{0}00~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \\[1.5ex] &= 0.200~\mathrm{mol~L^{-1}} \end{align*} \]